of a person, which allows the person to grasp the existence of God. This is very reminiscent of what Jacques Maritain calls the intuition of being, which he says is “a natural reasoning, that is, intuitive-like or irresistibly maintained in, and vitalized by, the intellectual flash of the intuition of existence which, seizing in some existing reality Being-with-nothingness, by the same stroke makes the mind grasp the necessity of Being-without-nothingness” (Maritain, Approaches to God). This is neither pure intuition nor a type of articulated knowledge. It is the intuition of one’s own existence and the existence of other things, most of all the existence of things --- that there is anything at all. That in the grandeur of the cosmos many people see the action and effect of God has always been a part of the Judeo-Christian tradition. Consider Psalm 19, which eloquently gives witness to this: “The heavens are telling the glory of God; and the firmament proclaims his handiwork. Day to day pours forth speech, and night to night declares knowledge. There is no speech, nor are there words; their voice is not heard; yet their voice goes out through all the earth, and their words to the end of the world” (Psalm 19, RSV). Likewise, Psalm 8 is similar in words: “O LORD, our Lord, how majestic is Your name in all the earth! You whose glory above the heavens is chanted…When I look at your heavens, the work of your fingers, the moon and the stars which you have established; what is man that you are mindful of him, and the son of man that you do care for him? Yet you have made him little less than God, and do crown him with glory and honor” (Psalm 8, RSV). For the writers of those psalms the heavens are a testament to the glory of their Creator. The celestial objects contained in them are the wondrous effects of the Lord Who made them. They point to the God who lies beyond them. More examples throughout the history of the Church include St. Francis of Assisi: “Most high, all powerful, all good Lord! All praise is yours, all glory, all honor, and all blessing. To you, alone, Most High, do they belong. No mortal lips are worthy to pronounce your name. Be praised, my Lord, through all your creatures, especially through my lord Brother Sun, who brings the day; and you give light through him. And he is beautiful and radiant in all his splendor! Of you, Most High, he bears the likeness. Be praised, my Lord, through Sister Moon and the stars; in the heavens you have made them, precious and beautiful” (St. Francis, “Canticle of the Sun”). Three centuries later St. Ignatius of Loyola remarked that It was his greatest consolation to gaze upon the heavens and the stars, which he often did, and for long stretches at a time, because when doing so he felt within himself a powerful urge to be serving our Lord (St. Ignatius of Loyola, Autobiography, 11). Here Ignatius and other people of faith give voice to the belief that man knows his very purpose, his meaning, and his destiny to be somehow intimately bound with the greater existence of the cosmos which surrounds him, even if he cannot know particulars immediately. Each and every person knows that somehow he is a part of the greater whole in which he lives, and to the extent that he can fathom something of the mystery of the cosmos around him, he can also see something of the mystery of himself, of his own identity, and of his own meaning. To this end, the sense of wonder and curiosity aroused by the cosmos do not remain static; there is the desire to understand reality, to know it more deeply. One can sense the verity of Aristotle’s first sentence in The Metaphysics: “All men by nature desire to know.” The desire to probe deeper into the mysteries of the cosmos holds the basic presupposition that there is something to understand. That the cosmos can be understood means that it can be known by reason, that it is reasonable. Pope Benedict notes this when he says, “In the great rationality of the world we can intuit the creator spirit from which it comes, and in the beauty of creation we can intuit something of the beauty, of the grandeur and also the goodness of God” (Pope Benedict XVI, “Seeing God Again on the World’s Horizon”). This is nothing new in the Catholic tradition. In the early centuries of the Church’s history, Christian theologians and philosophers were able to dialogue with the Greco-Roman philosophers of their day because of their shared belief in an intelligible universe, permeated by “logos” or reason. Whatever their differences, at least there was the belief in a common reason to which both could appeal. Moreover, there was the belief among early Christian apologists that the faith itself was reasonable, a belief that presupposed a harmony between faith and reason. In fact, the interplay between the desire for understanding and religious faith has been a hallmark of Catholic theology throughout the centuries, something summarized nicely by the phrases credo ut intelligam (I believe that I may understand), intellego ut credam (I understand that I might believe), and fides quaerens intellectum (faith seeking understanding) as stated by Augustine, Abelard, and Anselm, respectively. Such sayings imply not only a coexistence between faith and reason but also a certain intrinsic connection between the two whereby faith sees reason as something not merely to be tolerated but as something good and necessary. Belief in a harmony between faith and reason is no mere abstraction. Its implications and consequences were realized in the Christian culture that gradually emerged in the centuries after the fall of the Roman Empire. The early Christian apologists recognized the truth of various aspects of Greek philosophy and used it to dialogue with the non-Christians of antiquity. The great monasteries sought to preserve learning after the fall of the Roman empire. Medieval universities harmonized faith and reason through Aristotelianism and by borrowing from other fonts of learning re-acquired from the Greeks via the great Arabic civilization of the time. The revival of classical studies and the notion of a liberal education typical of Renaissance humanism became the basis of modern education. Even today the educational system administered by the Church in many parts of the world keeps this important engagement of faith and reason alive. All of these examples come from the belief that reason itself stems from God and that the rationality of man is an intrinsic part of what it means to be made in the image of God. As such, human endeavors, such as science, which seek the truth, are good. Here one crucial aspect of the Catholic Christian view of the world emerges: grace builds on nature. This is a direct consequence of the Incarnation itself whereby God having entered the world signifies that the very fabric of this reality itself is a conduit for the divine. What are the characteristics of the interplay between faith and reason, both of which serve to further the pursuit of truth? Here astronomy has been immensely influential in revealing a cosmic reality from which certain things may be surmised. First, there is the belief that what man observes is indeed an objective reality, even if he cannot comprehend its full scope. Second, the fact that there are scientific laws which describe a universe imbued with order (even in the midst of chaos) and logic tells man that the universe not only just exists; it exists in a certain way, according to an underlying reason. Moreover, it is a reason that is intelligible to the human mind--- the universe actually makes sense! Third, from the point of view of faith, there is a unity to all things in the universe that fills man with notions of beauty, good, and truth. This unity points to a more fundamental causal principle, God, who permeates every level of its existence. Man therefore can begin to know God’s presence by reason, but the fullness of God’s presence can be known more fully by faith. St. Paul tells us: “Ever since the creation of the world His invisible nature, namely His eternal power and deity, has been clearly perceived in the things that have been made” (Romans 1:20, RSV). Pope John Paul II put it another way in Fides et Ratio: “Through the medium of creatures, God stirs in reason an intuition of his power and his divinity. This is to concede to human reason a capacity that seems almost to surpass its natural limitations and to reach for metaphysical inquiry (Pope John Paul II, Fides et Ratio, 22). Lastly, it should be mentioned that, from the religious point of view, positing God as the explanation for the reality of the cosmos does not come from what remains unexplainable now (as opposed to what science as explains) but from the conviction that the complexity observed, both that unexplained and explained by science, has God as its author. In everything that exists, from the smallest particles (quarks) of nature to the superclusters of galaxies observed on a cosmological scale, we see the divine fingerprint of God himself. This characteristic has been evident in the writings of many of the saints and theologians of the Church, including St. Ignatius, who, in the “Contemplation to Attain the Love of God”, tells us: To look how God dwells in creatures, in the elements, giving them being, in the plants vegetating, in the animals feeling in them, in men giving them to understand: 1) and so in me, giving me being, animating me, giving me sensation and making me to understand; 2) likewise making a temple of me, being created to the likeness and image of His Divine Majesty; reflecting as much on myself in the way which is said in the first Point, or in another which I feel to be better. In the same manner will be done on each point which follows (“Contemplation to Attain the Love of God” From The Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius Loyola, Trans. Elder Mullen, SJ). This, along with the “First Principle and Foundation”, located at the beginning of the Spiritual Exercises, is the basis for the Jesuit and Catholic principle of “Finding God in all Things”. Keeping this principle in mind, let me return briefly to the earlier-stated notion that the Vatican Observatory exists for the sake of scientific truth as a way of framing the larger discussion regarding the Christian faith and its approach to science. From the point of view of the pursuit of scientific truth, what the Specola does is no different from any other astronomical observatory or scientific institution. It exists to contribute to the deposit of scientific knowledge by probing the depths and mysteries of the cosmos in the hope that we might learn more about the structure and nature of the universe. Of course, some might object that the Vatican should not be in the business of operating an institute whose primary aim is to discover only physical truth as opposed to theological truth. After all, if a particular work of the Church is not explicitly theological, why should the Church be interested in it? Then again, in so far as the truth is concerned, even if it is “only” physical truth and not explicitly religious, it is still the truth. This fact alone makes it worthy of pursuit. All truth comes from God who is “The Truth” (“ I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life” as the Lord Jesus Christ tells us in the Gospel of John), even if He is not mentioned explicitly. In the end, the quest for scientific truth, which can be seen as studying the effects of the Creator, is a probing into the mind of God, the Origin of all, and into His beauty. In so far as we learn something more about the truth of the reality of the cosmos, we also learn something more of the Truth of the One who made it. The pursuit of truth by faith and science, has an additional element. It is not merely a passive type of contemplation, rather it is a contemplation in action. The one who contemplates is himself affected by what he beholds. He finds something of his meaning in his perception of the universe. A scientist is not simply content with gazing at the cosmos and settling upon one theory, but he is constantly probing the mysteries before him, refining his theories, and, hence, also deepening his perception of the universe and of reality. A person of faith is likewise changed by his contemplation of God and of His creation. It is a process of knowing God in ever deeper ways, such as through prayer, which forever changes the person and his view of God’s reality. Hence the contemplation of cosmos is not a static process of mere observing, since there is a movement and a joy in the pursuit of what lies beyond. Underlying this is an awareness that man’s destiny is somehow bound up with the splendor of the reality around him and that movement towards the great beyond is also a movement toward one’s destiny and meaning. From the point of view of the Church, the contemplation of the cosmos is the contemplation of God’s truth, something done for itself and for no other reason than delighting in the glory of God and communing with Him. II. Cosmic Liturgy A plaque located on the exterior of one of the telescope domes of the Vatican Observatory summarizes this well: Deum Creatorem Venite Adoremus (“Come, let us adore God the Creator”). In other words, the scientific work of the Specola, even if purely scientific in methodology and content, is an act of adoration of the God who is the author of all Truth. In a sense, it is a small part of the Church’s extended liturgy of the adoration of God, part of the great cosmic liturgy itself, which in its great complexity and majesty resounds to the praise of God. Admittedly there are other pressing concerns facing humanity at the moment, but it is equally clear that man’s desire to know about reality and truth is crucial to help him find his own place in this life. It serves to maintain his hope and sense of purpose in the midst of the many problems in the world which crush the spirit. Here it may be helpful if one examines how the Church regards certain aspects of its own proper liturgy as expressed in its supreme form in the Mass. In his classic work, entitled The Spirit of the Liturgy, the 20th century theologian, Romano Guardini, says the following: The Church, however, has another side. It embraces a sphere which is in a special sense free from purpose. And that is the liturgy...The liturgy wishes to teach, but not by means of an artificial system of aim-conscious educational influences; it simply creates an entire spiritual world in which the soul can live according to the requirements of its nature...When the liturgy is rightly regarded, it cannot be said to have a purpose, because it does not exist for the sake of humanity, but for the sake of God. In the liturgy man is no longer concerned with himself; his gaze is directed towards God. In it man is not so much intended to edify himself as to contemplate God's majesty. The liturgy means that the soul exists in God's presence, originates in Him, lives in a world of divine realities, truths, mysteries and symbols, and really lives its true, characteristic and fruitful life” (Guardini, search Adult search
New Jesuit
Review
2011
Vol. 2, # 8
Deum Creatorem Venite Adoremus:
A Jesuit Astronomer’s Musings on the Cosmos
by David Brown, S.J.
Fr. David Brown, S.J., works at the Vatican Observatory in Rome.
I. “Faith Seeking Understanding”
As a Jesuit astronomer working for the Vatican’s observatory, the Specola Vaticana, I am often asked, “Why does the Vatican have an astronomical observatory?” I offer three reasons for the Catholic Church’s patronage of such an institution: 1) for the sake of the truth; 2) in order to promote and to foster dialogue between the world of faith and the world of science, especially in an age when many people believe the two worlds to be fundamentally incompatible; and, 3) for the benefit of providing answers to people of faith who deserve substantive and sensible responses to the genuinely good questions that arise either through curiosity or from their interactions with others. The second and third answers are certainly of paramount importance in these times, especially in light of challenges facing the Church in a scientific age, which include stereotypes often attached to it in the aftermath of the Galileo affair since the 1600s. However important these two reasons may be for providing a rationale for the continued involvement of the Church in the sciences, they are not the primary reason for why the Church founded the Specola (and its predecessors). From a historical point of view and with regard to its fundamental mission, the first answer -- for the sake of truth -- is the most important justification for the existence of the Specola: it reveals much about the Catholic Christian worldview and about its engagement with science.
Nevertheless, another question arises: “Why does (or should) the Church take an interest in any science, not just astronomy, especially when there are many other pressing problems in the world?" One can almost hear the faint echoes of the famous question once asked by Tertullian in times of antiquity: “What has Athens to do with Jerusalem?” The Catholic Christian answer has always been “everything”, and the “pursuit of truth” is the proper way to understand this. It was crucial to the Church’s capacity to engage Greco-Roman culture and philosophy as Christianity spread throughout the Roman Empire. Since then, it has been essential to the faith’s understanding of humanity’s place in God’s creation as seen by the multitude of great monasteries, universities, and other educational institutions that have arisen up until the present, places where men of intellect and education and faith have striven to provide a unified vision of reality around them.
“The pursuit of truth” is a characteristic so basic to human beings (something that does not necessarily require religious faith) that the Church supports institutions which participate in the universal desire to make sense of it all. It encourages something that other human beings have always done because it is part of the human family. Human beings behold a universe and a reality in which they live, and they wonder about it. They ask fundamental questions about the meaning of what they behold: “how” and “why.” Among the sciences, astronomy lends itself most easily to provoking a sense of wonder from nearly everyone on Earth. A person need only look up at the night-time sky and marvel at the beauty of the stars, the vastness of the cosmos, and the sublimity and mystery of its nature to be confronted by questions of meaning and existence. Consider the following: in the known universe, there could be up to one million million galaxies, each containing one million million stars, which itself might constitute 4% of a much larger unseen universe (if theories of dark matter and dark energy are true), the totality of which might have any number of dimensions -- between 4 and 57, depending on which theory is invoked. According to current theory, this universe came into existence in a Big Bang 14 thousand million years ago at what is taken to be the beginning of time, and it may be one of an infinite number of universes. From the smallest scales (microscopic aspects) of our universe which confront us with quarks as fundamental building blocks of matter (as we know it at the moment), to the possible existence of the Higgs Boson (the ‘God’ particle), to notions of quantum foam and virtual particles in a quantum vacuum, to the large-scale structure of the cosmos which presents us with exotic objects such as black holes, the reality which we call the cosmos provokes wonder and leads to fundamental questions which affect every human being: “What is the nature of this reality”, “what does it all mean”, “what is my place in this cosmos”, “what is the origin and fate of what I behold”, “what is the meaning of life”, and, simply, “why”.
Of course, one does not have to be a scientist or a philosopher to ask these existential questions. Moreover, astronomy is one of the few sciences in which a person does not have to be an astronomer or a physicist in order to appreciate its subject matter and to be led subsequently to deeper questions of meaning. This is one of the reasons why the Church has always had a long tradition of doing astronomy in one way or another throughout the centuries.
Confronted by the majesty, intricacy, and vastness of the cosmos, the person becomes aware of being part of something that goes beyond him, of something which is greater than he, but of which he is intrinsically connected at some deep level. For the believer, it is a moment of being struck by the existence of the One God who is the source of all that is. Pope Benedict XVI echoes this sense of seeing the divine fingerprint in the grandeur of the universe in his address to Germany prior to his 2012 state visit:
the capacity to perceive God, a capacity that exists in us. We can intuit something of God's grandeur in the grandeur of the cosmos. We can use the world through technology because it is made in a rational manner. In the great rationality of the world we can intuit the creator spirit from which it comes, and in the beauty of creation we can intuit something of the beauty, of the grandeur and also the goodness of God” (Benedict XVI, “Seeing God Again on the World’s Horizon”).
The intuition about which the Pope speaks is an instance when the human mind and heart experience a pre-philosophical moment of knowledge, guided by a primordial movement of the natural reason of a person, which allows the person to grasp the existence of God. This is very reminiscent of what Jacques Maritain calls the intuition of being, which he says is “a natural reasoning, that is, intuitive-like or irresistibly maintained in, and vitalized by, the intellectual flash of the intuition of existence which, seizing in some existing reality Being-with-nothingness, by the same stroke makes the mind grasp the necessity of Being-without-nothingness” (Maritain, Approaches to God). This is neither pure intuition nor a type of articulated knowledge. It is the intuition of one’s own existence and the existence of other things, most of all the existence of things --- that there is anything at all.
That in the grandeur of the cosmos many people see the action and effect of God has always been a part of the Judeo-Christian tradition. Consider Psalm 19, which eloquently gives witness to this:
“The heavens are telling the glory of God; and the firmament proclaims his handiwork. Day to day pours forth speech, and night to night declares knowledge. There is no speech, nor are there words; their voice is not heard; yet their voice goes out through all the earth, and their words to the end of the world” (Psalm 19, RSV).
Likewise, Psalm 8 is similar in words:
“O LORD, our Lord, how majestic is Your name in all the earth! You whose glory above the heavens is chanted…When I look at your heavens, the work of your fingers, the moon and the stars which you have established; what is man that you are mindful of him, and the son of man that you do care for him? Yet you have made him little less than God, and do crown him with glory and honor” (Psalm 8, RSV).
For the writers of those psalms the heavens are a testament to the glory of their Creator. The celestial objects contained in them are the wondrous effects of the Lord Who made them. They point to the God who lies beyond them. More examples throughout the history of the Church include St. Francis of Assisi:
“Most high, all powerful, all good Lord! All praise is yours, all glory, all honor, and all blessing. To you, alone, Most High, do they belong. No mortal lips are worthy to pronounce your name. Be praised, my Lord, through all your creatures, especially through my lord Brother Sun, who brings the day; and you give light through him. And he is beautiful and radiant in all his splendor! Of you, Most High, he bears the likeness. Be praised, my Lord, through Sister Moon and the stars; in the heavens you have made them, precious and beautiful” (St. Francis, “Canticle of the Sun”).
Three centuries later St. Ignatius of Loyola remarked that
It was his greatest consolation to gaze upon the heavens and the stars, which he often did, and for long stretches at a time, because when doing so he felt within himself a powerful urge to be serving our Lord (St. Ignatius of Loyola, Autobiography, 11).
Here Ignatius and other people of faith give voice to the belief that man knows his very purpose, his meaning, and his destiny to be somehow intimately bound with the greater existence of the cosmos which surrounds him, even if he cannot know particulars immediately. Each and every person knows that somehow he is a part of the greater whole in which he lives, and to the extent that he can fathom something of the mystery of the cosmos around him, he can also see something of the mystery of himself, of his own identity, and of his own meaning. To this end, the sense of wonder and curiosity aroused by the cosmos do not remain static; there is the desire to understand reality, to know it more deeply. One can sense the verity of Aristotle’s first sentence in The Metaphysics: “All men by nature desire to know.”
The desire to probe deeper into the mysteries of the cosmos holds the basic presupposition that there is something to understand. That the cosmos can be understood means that it can be known by reason, that it is reasonable. Pope Benedict notes this when he says, “In the great rationality of the world we can intuit the creator spirit from which it comes, and in the beauty of creation we can intuit something of the beauty, of the grandeur and also the goodness of God” (Pope Benedict XVI, “Seeing God Again on the World’s Horizon”). This is nothing new in the Catholic tradition. In the early centuries of the Church’s history, Christian theologians and philosophers were able to dialogue with the Greco-Roman philosophers of their day because of their shared belief in an intelligible universe, permeated by “logos” or reason. Whatever their differences, at least there was the belief in a common reason to which both could appeal. Moreover, there was the belief among early Christian apologists that the faith itself was reasonable, a belief that presupposed a harmony between faith and reason. In fact, the interplay between the desire for understanding and religious faith has been a hallmark of Catholic theology throughout the centuries, something summarized nicely by the phrases credo ut intelligam (I believe that I may understand), intellego ut credam (I understand that I might believe), and fides quaerens intellectum (faith seeking understanding) as stated by Augustine, Abelard, and Anselm, respectively. Such sayings imply not only a coexistence between faith and reason but also a certain intrinsic connection between the two whereby faith sees reason as something not merely to be tolerated but as something good and necessary.